Our institute is brand new; learn more about our story // vibe // ideas .

Overview

Our perceptual systems are pattern-finding machines! By understanding the tendency to find patterns when there aren't any this tendency can be more exclusively beneficial.

Types

Name Description Sources
Clustering illusion The tendency to overestimate the importance of small runs, streaks, or clusters in large samples of random data (that is, seeing phantom patterns). [1] [2]
Illusory correlation Inaccurately perceiving a relationship between two unrelated events. [1] [3, 4]
Selection bias The tendency to notice something more when something causes us to be more aware of it, such as when we buy a car, we tend to notice similar cars more often than we did before. They are not suddenly more common – we just are noticing them more. [1]

Performance Perspectives

  • Consider patterns you notice as those for further consideration as opposed to relying on the intuition that by virtue of noticing the pattern it must be a non-random or important one.

Related Fallacies

Name Description Sources
Correlation implies causation A faulty assumption that, because there is a correlation between two variables, one caused the other. [5] [6]
Temporal sequence implies causation X happened, then Y happened; therefore X caused Y. [5] [7]
Wrong direction (reverse causation) Cause and effect are reversed. The cause is said to be the effect and vice versa. [5] [8]
Regression fallacy Ascribes cause where none exists. The flaw is failing to account for natural fluctuations. It is frequently a special kind of post hoc fallacy. [5]
References & Acknowledgements

[1] Wikipedia contributors. "List of cognitive biases." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 14 Jul. 2020. Web. 23 Jul. 2020. link

[2] Iverson GL, Brooks BL, Holdnack JA (2008). "Misdiagnosis of Cognitive Impairment in Forensic Neuropsychology". In Heilbronner RL (ed.). Neuropsychology in the Courtroom: Expert Analysis of Reports and Testimony. New York: Guilford Press. p. 248. ISBN 9781593856342.

[3] Tversky A, Kahneman D (September 1974). "Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases". Science. 185 (4157): 1124–31. Bibcode:1974Sci...185.1124T. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. PMID 17835457.

[4] Fiedler K (1991). "The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: An information loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60 (1): 24–36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.24.

[5] Wikipedia contributors. "List of fallacies." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 26 Jul. 2020. Web. 28 Jul. 2020.

[6] Pirie, Madsen (2006). How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic. A&C Black. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-8264-9006-3. Retrieved 10 September 2015.

[7] Damer, T. Edward (2009). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-free Arguments (6th ed.). Wadsworth. ISBN 978-0-495-09506-4. Retrieved 30 November 2010.

[8] Gula, Robert J. (2002). Nonsense: Red Herrings, Straw Men and Sacred Cows: How We Abuse Logic in Our Everyday Language. Axios Press. ISBN 978-0-9753662-6-4.

Content derived from the hard work of many Wikipedia contributors and thus licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0, click here to read the license. Read more about our content approach here and see references above for specific source attributions.